You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy for Post-Cesarean Acute Kidney Injury in Severe Preeclampsia: a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinics, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1797 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wallace Andrino da Silva, Carlo Victor A. Varela, Aline Macedo Pinheiro, Paula Castro Scherer, Rossana P.V. Francisco, Marcelo Luis Abramides Torres, Maria José C. Carmona, Fernando Bliacheriene, Lúcia C. Andrade, Paolo Pelosi, Luiz Marcelo S. Malbouisson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 9 | 38% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
Colombia | 1 | 4% |
Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
Peru | 1 | 4% |
Guatemala | 1 | 4% |
Argentina | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 23 | 96% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
Researcher | 3 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 17% |
Unknown | 24 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 27 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,314,417
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#87
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,784
of 428,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.