↓ Skip to main content

Influence of Genetic Variation on Plasma Protein Levels in Older Adults Using a Multi-Analyte Panel

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of Genetic Variation on Plasma Protein Levels in Older Adults Using a Multi-Analyte Panel
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0070269
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sungeun Kim, Shanker Swaminathan, Mark Inlow, Shannon L. Risacher, Kwangsik Nho, Li Shen, Tatiana M. Foroud, Ronald C. Petersen, Paul S. Aisen, Holly Soares, Jon B. Toledo, Leslie M. Shaw, John Q. Trojanowski, Michael W. Weiner, Brenna C. McDonald, Martin R. Farlow, Bernardino Ghetti, Andrew J. Saykin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 121 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 9%
Other 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Student > Master 6 5%
Professor 5 4%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 76 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Computer Science 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 81 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2017.
All research outputs
#5,763,541
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#70,357
of 195,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,532
of 198,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,504
of 4,798 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,798 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.