You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ISA-TAB-Nano: A Specification for Sharing Nanomaterial Research Data in Spreadsheet-based Format
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Biotechnology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6750-13-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dennis G Thomas, Sharon Gaheen, Stacey L Harper, Martin Fritts, Fred Klaessig, Elizabeth Hahn-Dantona, David Paik, Sue Pan, Grace A Stafford, Elaine T Freund, Juli D Klemm, Nathan A Baker |
| Abstract |
The high-throughput genomics communities have been successfully using standardized spreadsheet-based formats to capture and share data within labs and among public repositories. The nanomedicine community has yet to adopt similar standards to share the diverse and multi-dimensional types of data (including metadata) pertaining to the description and characterization of nanomaterials. Owing to the lack of standardization in representing and sharing nanomaterial data, most of the data currently shared via publications and data resources are incomplete, poorly-integrated, and not suitable for meaningful interpretation and re-use of the data. Specifically, in its current state, data cannot be effectively utilized for the development of predictive models that will inform the rational design of nanomaterials. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 63 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 28% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2013.
All research outputs
#5,024,776
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#267
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,316
of 291,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.