You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nanostructural and Transcriptomic Analyses of Human Saliva Derived Exosomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0008577 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Viswanathan Palanisamy, Shivani Sharma, Amit Deshpande, Hui Zhou, James Gimzewski, David T. Wong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 292 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 64 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 15% |
| Unknown | 54 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 54 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 16% |
| Engineering | 18 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 62 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,922,392
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#85,026
of 224,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,355
of 174,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#212
of 640 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 640 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.