↓ Skip to main content

Potential drug interactions and duplicate prescriptions among ambulatory cancer patients: a prevalence study using an advanced screening method

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potential drug interactions and duplicate prescriptions among ambulatory cancer patients: a prevalence study using an advanced screening method
Published in
BMC Cancer, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-10-679
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roelof WF van Leeuwen, Eleonora L Swart, Frits A Boom, Martin S Schuitenmaker, Jacqueline G Hugtenburg

Abstract

The pharmacotherapeutic treatment of patients with cancer is generally associated with multiple side-effects. Drug interactions and duplicate prescriptions between anti-cancer drugs or interactions with medication to treat comorbidity can reinforce or intensify side-effects.The aim of the present study is to gain more insight into the prevalence of drug interactions and duplicate prescriptions among patients being treated in the outpatient day care departments for oncology and hematological illnesses. For the first time the prevalence of drug interactions with OTC-drugs in cancer patients will be studied. Possible risk factors for the occurrence of these drug-related problems will also be studied.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 12%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 17 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2013.
All research outputs
#18,326,065
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,414
of 8,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,356
of 180,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#35
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.