You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Significant perturbation of vitamin D–parathyroid–calcium axis and adverse clinical outcomes in critically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-012-2713-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Priya Nair, Paul Lee, Claire Reynolds, Nguyen Dinh Nguyen, John Myburgh, John A. Eisman, Jacqueline R. Center |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 28% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 61% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,487,068
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,854
of 4,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,077
of 173,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#18
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.