↓ Skip to main content

What Information Is Necessary for Speech Categorization? Harnessing Variability in the Speech Signal by Integrating Cues Computed Relative to Expectations

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Review, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
200 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What Information Is Necessary for Speech Categorization? Harnessing Variability in the Speech Signal by Integrating Cues Computed Relative to Expectations
Published in
Psychological Review, January 2011
DOI 10.1037/a0022325
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bob McMurray, Allard Jongman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 7%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 171 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 32%
Researcher 35 18%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Professor 13 7%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 36%
Linguistics 50 26%
Neuroscience 11 6%
Engineering 6 3%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 31 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Review
#1,370
of 1,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,802
of 190,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Review
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.