↓ Skip to main content

Responding to mentalization invitations in psychotherapy sessions—A conversation analysis approach

Overview of attention for article published in Psychotherapy Research, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Responding to mentalization invitations in psychotherapy sessions—A conversation analysis approach
Published in
Psychotherapy Research, September 2016
DOI 10.1080/10503307.2016.1219422
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henrich Keselman, Karin Osvaldsson Cromdal, Niclas Kullgard, Rolf Holmqvist

Abstract

Increase in the capacity to mentalize has been proposed to be an important mechanism of change in psychotherapy. However, mentalization has primarily been studied as an individual skill that people either possess or lack, rather than as an interactional phenomenon. In this study, excerpts from three different sessions in a therapy that aimed at increasing the patients mentalizing capacity were identified and studied using conversation analysis. The analysis indicated that resistance to mentalizing may not only be due to lack of capacity but also may be seen as a linguistic resource in which this resistance demonstrates precisely the ability to mentalize. Consequences for psychotherapy practice and process research are discussed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 32%
Student > Master 3 14%
Unspecified 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 14%
Other 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 36%
Social Sciences 6 27%
Unspecified 4 18%
Linguistics 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2016.
All research outputs
#9,881,739
of 12,378,717 outputs
Outputs from Psychotherapy Research
#298
of 396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,479
of 266,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychotherapy Research
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,378,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 396 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.