You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Persisting positron emission tomography lesion activity and Mycobacterium tuberculosis mRNA after tuberculosis cure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nm.4177 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanus T Malherbe, Shubhada Shenai, Katharina Ronacher, Andre G Loxton, Gregory Dolganov, Magdalena Kriel, Tran Van, Ray Y Chen, James Warwick, Laura E Via, Taeksun Song, Myungsun Lee, Gary Schoolnik, Gerard Tromp, David Alland, Clifton E Barry, Jill Winter, Gerhard Walzl, Lance Lucas, Gian van der Spuy, Kim Stanley, Lani Thiart, Bronwyn Smith, Nelita Du Plessis, Caroline G G Beltran, Elizna Maasdorp, Annare Ellmann, Hongjo Choi, Joonsung Joh, Lori E Dodd, Brian Allwood, Coenie Koegelenberg, Morné Vorster, Stephanie Griffith-Richards |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| Grenada | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 63% |
| Scientists | 8 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 210 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 17% |
| Unknown | 50 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 25% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 32 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 61 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 117. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#362,231
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#1,297
of 9,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,936
of 347,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#16
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.