↓ Skip to main content

Joint Ancestry and Association Testing in Admixed Individuals

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Joint Ancestry and Association Testing in Admixed Individuals
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, December 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002325
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Shriner, Adebowale Adeyemo, Charles N. Rotimi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 105 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 28%
Researcher 30 27%
Student > Master 10 9%
Professor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Mathematics 8 7%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 14 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2021.
All research outputs
#20,817,194
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#8,249
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,211
of 249,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#95
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.