↓ Skip to main content

PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility
Published in
Systematic Reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-2-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison Booth, Mike Clarke, Gordon Dooley, Davina Ghersi, David Moher, Mark Petticrew, Lesley Stewart

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 54 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Other 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 39%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Psychology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 11 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2015.
All research outputs
#732,893
of 9,719,266 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#169
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,204
of 307,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,719,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.