You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Male involvement in prevention programs of mother to child transmission of HIV: a systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-2-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frederick Morfaw, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Lehana Thabane, Clarissa Rodrigues, Ana-Paula Wunderlich, Philip Nana, John Kunda |
| Abstract |
Many reports point to the beneficial effect of male partner involvement in programs for the prevention of mother-to-child-transmission (PMTCT) of HIV in curbing pediatric HIV infections. This paper summarizes the barriers and facilitators of male involvement in prevention programs of mother-to-child-transmission of HIV. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 452 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Malawi | 1 | <1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 443 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 102 | 23% |
| Researcher | 63 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 37 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 7% |
| Other | 71 | 16% |
| Unknown | 106 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 153 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 62 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 55 | 12% |
| Psychology | 14 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 51 | 11% |
| Unknown | 108 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,365,724
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,286
of 1,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,461
of 284,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.