↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors for developing COVID-19: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK)

Overview of attention for article published in Thorax, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 5,693)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
81 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
204 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk factors for developing COVID-19: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK)
Published in
Thorax, November 2021
DOI 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217487
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hayley Holt, Mohammad Talaei, Matthew Greenig, Dominik Zenner, Jane Symons, Clare Relton, Katherine S Young, Molly R Davies, Katherine N Thompson, Jed Ashman, Sultan Saeed Rajpoot, Ahmed Ali Kayyale, Sarah El Rifai, Philippa J Lloyd, David Jolliffe, Olivia Timmis, Sarah Finer, Stamatina Iliodromiti, Alec Miners, Nicholas S Hopkinson, Bodrul Alam, Graham Lloyd-Jones, Thomas Dietrich, Iain Chapple, Paul E Pfeffer, David McCoy, Gwyneth Davies, Ronan A Lyons, Christopher Griffiths, Frank Kee, Aziz Sheikh, Gerome Breen, Seif O Shaheen, Adrian R Martineau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 204 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Unspecified 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 28 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Unspecified 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 30 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 789. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#24,012
of 25,390,970 outputs
Outputs from Thorax
#15
of 5,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#775
of 518,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thorax
#1
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,970 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.