The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 198 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk factors for developing COVID-19: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Thorax, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217487 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hayley Holt, Mohammad Talaei, Matthew Greenig, Dominik Zenner, Jane Symons, Clare Relton, Katherine S Young, Molly R Davies, Katherine N Thompson, Jed Ashman, Saeed Rajpoot, Ahmed Ali Kayyale, Sarah El Rifai, Philippa J Lloyd, David Jolliffe, Olivia Timmis, Sarah Finer, Stamatina Iliodromiti, Alec Miners, Nicholas S Hopkinson, Bodrul Alam, Graham Lloyd-Jones, Thomas Dietrich, Iain Chapple, Paul E Pfeffer, David McCoy, Gwyneth Davies, Ronan A Lyons, Christopher Griffiths, Frank Kee, Aziz Sheikh, Gerome Breen, Seif O Shaheen, Adrian R Martineau |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 9 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 4% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 2 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 163 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 177 | 89% |
| Scientists | 10 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 30 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 32 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 785. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#25,903
of 26,375,927 outputs
Outputs from Thorax
#18
of 5,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#914
of 529,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thorax
#2
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.