↓ Skip to main content

Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, December 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 2,252)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
98 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
598 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
704 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, December 1998
DOI 10.3758/bf03208840
Authors

Daniel J. Simons, Daniel T. Levin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 704 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 26 4%
United Kingdom 13 2%
Germany 6 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Turkey 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Other 13 2%
Unknown 630 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 147 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 124 18%
Researcher 94 13%
Student > Master 89 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 36 5%
Other 133 19%
Unknown 81 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 385 55%
Computer Science 44 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 4%
Neuroscience 24 3%
Social Sciences 20 3%
Other 99 14%
Unknown 104 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#323,492
of 25,994,718 outputs
Outputs from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#50
of 2,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215
of 110,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,994,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them