You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A “Practical” Ethic for Animals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10806-011-9353-z |
| Authors |
David Fraser |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 18% |
| Researcher | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 15% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 12 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 21% |
| Unknown | 31 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,112,493
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
#79
of 414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,149
of 146,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.