↓ Skip to main content

Differences in children and adolescents with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a cohort study in a Brazilian tertiary referral hospital

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in children and adolescents with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a cohort study in a Brazilian tertiary referral hospital
Published in
Clinics, January 2021
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2021/e3488
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heloisa Helena de Sousa Marques, Maria Fernanda Badue Pereira, Angélica Carreira dos Santos, Thais Toledo Fink, Camila Sanson Yoshino de Paula, Nadia Litvinov, Claudio Schvartsman, Artur Figueiredo Delgado, Maria Augusta Bento Cicaroni Gibelli, Werther Brunow de Carvalho, Vicente Odone, Uenis Tannuri, Magda Carneiro-Sampaio, Sandra Grisi, Alberto José da Silva Duarte, Leila Antonangelo, Rossana Pucineli Vieira Francisco, Thelma Suely Okay, Linamara Rizzo Batisttella, Carlos Roberto Ribeiro de Carvalho, Alexandra Valéria Maria Brentani, Clovis Artur Silva, HC-FMUSP Pediatric COVID Study Group

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 12 26%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 12 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Psychology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 13 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2021.
All research outputs
#20,710,927
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#893
of 1,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#429,206
of 502,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#68
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.