↓ Skip to main content

Fusobacterium Is Associated with Colorectal Adenomas

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
436 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
388 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fusobacterium Is Associated with Colorectal Adenomas
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0053653
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amber N. McCoy, Félix Araújo-Pérez, Andrea Azcárate-Peril, Jen Jen Yeh, Robert S. Sandler, Temitope O. Keku

Abstract

The human gut microbiota is increasingly recognized as a player in colorectal cancer (CRC). While particular imbalances in the gut microbiota have been linked to colorectal adenomas and cancer, no specific bacterium has been identified as a risk factor. Recent studies have reported a high abundance of Fusobacterium in CRC subjects compared to normal subjects, but this observation has not been reported for adenomas, CRC precursors. We assessed the abundance of Fusobacterium species in the normal rectal mucosa of subjects with (n = 48) and without adenomas (n = 67). We also confirmed previous reports on Fusobacterium and CRC in 10 CRC tumor tissues and 9 matching normal tissues by pyrosequencing. We extracted DNA from rectal mucosal biopsies and measured bacterial levels by quantitative PCR of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene. Local cytokine gene expression was also determined in mucosal biopsies from adenoma cases and controls by quantitative PCR. The mean log abundance of Fusobacterium or cytokine gene expression between cases and controls was compared by t-test. Logistic regression was used to compare tertiles of Fusobacterium abundance. Adenoma subjects had a significantly higher abundance of Fusobacterium species compared to controls (p = 0.01). Compared to the lowest tertile, subjects with high abundance of Fusobacterium were significantly more likely to have adenomas (OR 3.66, 95% CI 1.37-9.74, p-trend 0.005). Cases but not controls had a significant positive correlation between local cytokine gene expression and Fusobacterium abundance. Among cases, the correlation for local TNF-α and Fusobacterium was r = 0.33, p = 0.06 while it was 0.44, p = 0.01 for Fusobacterium and IL-10. These results support a link between the abundance of Fusobacterium in colonic mucosa and adenomas and suggest a possible role for mucosal inflammation in this process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 378 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 72 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 15%
Student > Master 46 12%
Student > Bachelor 36 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 63 16%
Unknown 91 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 78 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 31 8%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 27 7%
Unknown 99 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,684,782
of 25,608,265 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#20,697
of 223,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,926
of 309,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#441
of 4,873 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,608,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,873 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.