↓ Skip to main content

Duodenal Infusion of Donor Feces for RecurrentClostridium difficile

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2744 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2592 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Duodenal Infusion of Donor Feces for RecurrentClostridium difficile
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, January 2013
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1205037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Els van Nood, Anne Vrieze, Max Nieuwdorp, Susana Fuentes, Erwin G. Zoetendal, Willem M. de Vos, Caroline E. Visser, Ed J. Kuijper, Joep F.W.M. Bartelsman, Jan G.P. Tijssen, Peter Speelman, Marcel G.W. Dijkgraaf, Josbert J. Keller

Abstract

Recurrent Clostridium difficile infection is difficult to treat, and failure rates for antibiotic therapy are high. We studied the effect of duodenal infusion of donor feces in patients with recurrent C. difficile infection.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 964 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,592 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 29 1%
United Kingdom 16 <1%
Japan 10 <1%
Canada 9 <1%
Brazil 8 <1%
Denmark 7 <1%
France 6 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
Germany 6 <1%
Other 25 <1%
Unknown 2470 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 413 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 363 14%
Student > Bachelor 363 14%
Student > Master 281 11%
Other 239 9%
Other 571 22%
Unknown 362 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 942 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 453 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 255 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 167 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 60 2%
Other 247 10%
Unknown 468 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2011. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,727
of 22,588,733 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#236
of 30,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14
of 283,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#2
of 311 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,588,733 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 116.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 311 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.