You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Reevaluation of the Morphology, Paleoecology, and Phylogenetic Relationships of the Enigmatic Walrus Pelagiarctos
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0054311 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robert W. Boessenecker, Morgan Churchill |
Abstract |
A number of aberrant walruses (Odobenidae) have been described from the Neogene of the North Pacific, including specialized suction-feeding and generalist fish-eating taxa. At least one of these fossil walruses has been hypothesized to have been a specialized predator of other marine mammals, the middle Miocene walrus Pelagiarctos thomasi from the Sharktooth Hill Bonebed of California (16.1-14.5 Ma). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 39% |
Japan | 2 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
Comoros | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Norway | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 75% |
Scientists | 5 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 2 | 2% |
United States | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Czechia | 1 | 1% |
Norway | 1 | 1% |
Argentina | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 81 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 17 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 44% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#617,428
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#8,343
of 224,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,569
of 294,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#165
of 4,868 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,868 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.