↓ Skip to main content

High and Far: Biases in the Location of Protected Areas

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
745 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1015 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High and Far: Biases in the Location of Protected Areas
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008273
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucas N. Joppa, Alexander Pfaff

Abstract

About an eighth of the earth's land surface is in protected areas (hereafter "PAs"), most created during the 20(th) century. Natural landscapes are critical for species persistence and PAs can play a major role in conservation and in climate policy. Such contributions may be harder than expected to implement if new PAs are constrained to the same kinds of locations that PAs currently occupy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,015 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 9 <1%
Brazil 6 <1%
Italy 5 <1%
United States 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Finland 4 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Belize 1 <1%
Other 10 <1%
Unknown 967 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 215 21%
Researcher 211 21%
Student > Master 167 16%
Student > Bachelor 85 8%
Other 51 5%
Other 143 14%
Unknown 143 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 342 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 328 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 45 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 29 3%
Social Sciences 20 2%
Other 41 4%
Unknown 210 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#695,996
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#9,275
of 224,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,335
of 175,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#29
of 613 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 613 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.