↓ Skip to main content

Distinct Profiles of Effector Cytokines Mark the Different Phases of Crohn’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distinct Profiles of Effector Cytokines Mark the Different Phases of Crohn’s Disease
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054562
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Zorzi, Ivan Monteleone, Massimiliano Sarra, Emma Calabrese, Irene Marafini, Micaela Cretella, Silvia Sedda, Livia Biancone, Francesco Pallone, Giovanni Monteleone

Abstract

Crohn's Disease (CD)-associated inflammation is supposed to be driven by T helper (Th)1/Th17 cell-derived cytokines, even though there is evidence that the mucosal profile of cytokine may vary with the evolution of the disease. We aimed at comparing the pattern of effector cytokines in early and established lesions of CD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 73 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 7 9%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 7%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2016.
All research outputs
#4,288,752
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#52,680
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,263
of 294,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,007
of 4,870 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,870 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.