↓ Skip to main content

Propofol for sedation during colonoscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Propofol for sedation during colonoscopy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006268.pub2
Authors

Harminder Singh, William Poluha, Mary Cheang, Nicole Choptain, Ernest Inegbu, Ken Baron, Shayne P Taback

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Denmark 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 121 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 19 15%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Other 16 12%
Other 42 33%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 58%
Unspecified 20 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Psychology 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,404,588
of 13,594,271 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,971
of 10,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,466
of 243,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#232
of 538 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,594,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 538 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.