You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mismatch Negativity and Cognitive Performance for the Prediction of Psychosis in Subjects with At-Risk Mental State
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0054080 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuko Higuchi, Tomiki Sumiyoshi, Tomonori Seo, Tomohiro Miyanishi, Yasuhiro Kawasaki, Michio Suzuki |
| Abstract |
A shorter duration of untreated psychosis has been associated with better prognosis in schizophrenia. In this study, we measured the duration mismatch negativity (dMMN), an event-related potential, and cognitive performance in subjects with at-risk mental state (ARMS), patients with first-episode or chronic schizophrenia, and healthy volunteers. The main interest was to determine if these neurocognitive measures predict progression to overt schizophrenia in ARMS subjects. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 15% |
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 46 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 33 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,422,524
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,165
of 193,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,936
of 284,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,933
of 4,841 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,841 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.