↓ Skip to main content

Risk Factors for Severe Cholera among Children under Five in Rural and Urban Bangladesh, 2000–2008: A Hospital-Based Surveillance Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk Factors for Severe Cholera among Children under Five in Rural and Urban Bangladesh, 2000–2008: A Hospital-Based Surveillance Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054395
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danny V. Colombara, Karen D. Cowgill, Abu S. G. Faruque

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 132 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 25%
Student > Bachelor 27 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 20%
Social Sciences 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Environmental Science 6 4%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,276,919
of 25,463,724 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#41,851
of 221,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,391
of 293,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#827
of 4,923 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,923 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.