↓ Skip to main content

The implications of brain lateralisation for modern general practice

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The implications of brain lateralisation for modern general practice
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, December 2015
DOI 10.3399/bjgp16x683341
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Goldie

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Lecturer 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 18%
Psychology 4 14%
Neuroscience 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Computer Science 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2021.
All research outputs
#20,340,423
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#4,115
of 4,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,330
of 393,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#79
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.