You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Métodos para avaliação da efetividade de vacinas para COVID-19 com ênfase em abordagens quase-experimentais
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1413-812320212611.18622021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Moreira Pescarini, Camila Silveira Silva Teixeira, Enny Paixão Cruz, Naia Ortelan, Priscila Fernanda Porto Scaff Pinto, Andrêa Jacqueline Fortes Ferreira, Flavia Jôse Oliveira Alves, Elzo Pereira Pinto, Ila Rocha Falcão, Aline dos Santos Rocha, Nivea Bispo da Silva, Renzo Flores Ortiz, Ramon da Costa Saavedra, Vinicius de Araújo Oliveira, Rita de Cássia Ribeiro-Silva, Maria Yury Travassos Ichihara, Viviane Boaventura, Manoel Barral, Ligia Regina Franco Sansigolo Kerr, Guilherme Loureiro Werneck, Mauricio L. Barreto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#14,614,797
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#859
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,964
of 443,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#20
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.