You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ Failure (Piro) Sepsis Classification System: Results of Hospital Mortality Using a Novel Concept and Methodological Approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0053885 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristina Granja, Pedro Póvoa, Cristina Lobo, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, António Carneiro, Altamiro Costa-Pereira |
| Abstract |
PIRO is a conceptual classification system in which a number of demographic, clinical, biological and laboratory variables are used to stratify patients with sepsis in categories with different outcomes, including mortality rates. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 22% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 61% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,758,411
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#79,537
of 193,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,479
of 284,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,670
of 4,895 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,895 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.