You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinicopathological prognostic implicators of oral squamous cell carcinoma: Need to understand and revise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
North American Journal of Medical Sciences, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.4103/1947-2714.123239 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kiran B. Jadhav, Nidhi Gupta |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2015.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from North American Journal of Medical Sciences
#139
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,487
of 292,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from North American Journal of Medical Sciences
#33
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.