↓ Skip to main content

Flavonoids, Flavonoid Subclasses and Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Epidemiologic Studies

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flavonoids, Flavonoid Subclasses and Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Epidemiologic Studies
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054318
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chang Hui, Xie Qi, Zhang Qianyong, Peng Xiaoli, Zhu Jundong, Mi Mantian

Abstract

Studies have suggested the chemopreventive effects of flavonoids on carcinogenesis. Yet numbers of epidemiologic studies assessing dietary flavonoids and breast cancer risk have yielded inconsistent results. The association between flavonoids, flavonoid subclasses (flavonols, flavan-3-ols, etc.) and the risk of breast cancer lacks systematic analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mauritius 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 220 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 23%
Student > Bachelor 38 17%
Researcher 21 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 42 19%
Unknown 44 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 6%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 53 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2022.
All research outputs
#804,568
of 25,067,172 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#10,741
of 217,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,501
of 297,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#219
of 4,915 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,067,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,915 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.