↓ Skip to main content

Pancreatic Islet Isolation

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: Pancreatic Islet Isolation
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Pancreatic Islet Isolation
Chapter number 1
Book title
Pancreatic Islet Isolation
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39824-2_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-939822-8, 978-3-31-939824-2
Authors

Ramírez-Domínguez, Miriam, Miriam Ramírez-Domínguez

Editors

Miriam Ramírez-Domínguez

Abstract

Until the discovery of insulin in the twentieth century, diabetes mellitus was a mortal disease with an unclear origin and physiology. Despite the appearance of the concept in an Egyptian papyrus dated c.1550 BC, and the documentation of its study by ancient Chinese, the term "diabetes" was only coined by the Greek Aretaeus in the second century AD. In Europe, the study of diabetes was largely ignored until the seventeenth century, when the characteristic sweet flavor of diabetic urine was first described. However, the link between diabetes and the pancreas was not discovered until 1889 by Minkowski and von Mering, long after the first description of the pancreatic islets by Paul Langerhans in 1869. One of the most significant milestones in the field was the discovery of insulin by Banting and collaborators in 1922, which led to the therapeutic development of insulin administration as a life-saving intervention for type 1 diabetic patients. On the other hand, the isolation of islets was first reported by Bensley in 1911, a critical technical achievement that paved the way for clinical islet transplantation. Here we discuss the history of islet isolation, since the firsts studies of diabetes by ancient civilizations to the birth and parallel evolution of islet isolation and transplantation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 14 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2017.
All research outputs
#14,858,822
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,270
of 4,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,210
of 337,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#31
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.