↓ Skip to main content

A “Trojan horse” bispecific-antibody strategy for broad protection against ebolaviruses

Overview of attention for article published in Science, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A “Trojan horse” bispecific-antibody strategy for broad protection against ebolaviruses
Published in
Science, September 2016
DOI 10.1126/science.aag3267
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Z Wec, Elisabeth K Nyakatura, Andrew S Herbert, Katie A Howell, Frederick W Holtsberg, Russell R Bakken, Eva Mittler, John R Christin, Sergey Shulenin, Rohit K Jangra, Sushma Bharrhan, Ana I Kuehne, Zachary A Bornholdt, Andrew I Flyak, Erica Ollmann Saphire, James E Crowe, M Javad Aman, John M Dye, Jonathan R Lai, Kartik Chandran

Abstract

There is an urgent need for monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies that broadly protect against Ebola virus and other filoviruses. The conserved, essential interaction between the filovirus glycoprotein, GP, and its entry receptor Niemann-Pick C1 (NPC1) provides an attractive target for such mAbs, but is shielded by multiple mechanisms, including physical sequestration in late endosomes. Here, we describe a bispecific antibody strategy to target this interaction, in which mAbs specific for NPC1 or the GP receptor-binding site are coupled to a mAb against a conserved, surface-exposed GP epitope. Bispecific antibodies, but not parent mAbs, neutralized all known ebolaviruses by coopting viral particles themselves for endosomal delivery, and conferred post-exposure protection against multiple ebolaviruses in mice. Such 'Trojan horse' bispecific antibodies have potential as broad anti-filovirus immunotherapeutics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 197 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 21%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Master 18 9%
Professor 10 5%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 34 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 26 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 6%
Chemistry 10 5%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 40 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 627. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#36,491
of 25,918,061 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,542
of 83,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#698
of 344,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#21
of 1,065 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,065 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.