↓ Skip to main content

Organically Grown Food Provides Health Benefits to Drosophila melanogaster

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
81 X users
facebook
25 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
14 Google+ users
reddit
4 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Organically Grown Food Provides Health Benefits to Drosophila melanogaster
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0052988
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ria Chhabra, Santharam Kolli, Johannes H. Bauer

Abstract

The "organic food" market is the fastest growing food sector, yet it is unclear whether organically raised food is nutritionally superior to conventionally grown food and whether consuming organic food bestows health benefits. In order to evaluate potential health benefits of organic foods, we used the well-characterized fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster as a model system. Fruit flies were raised on a diets consisting of extracts of either conventionally or organically raised produce (bananas, potatoes, raisins, soy beans). Flies were then subjected to a variety of tests designed to assess overall fly health. Flies raised on diets made from organically grown produce had greater fertility and longevity. On certain food sources, greater activity and greater stress resistance was additionally observed, suggesting that organic food bestows positive effects on fly health. Our data show that Drosophila can be used as a convenient model system to experimentally test potential health effects of dietary components. Using this system, we provide evidence that organically raised food may provide animals with tangible benefits to overall health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Portugal 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 98 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 27 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 181. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2023.
All research outputs
#229,416
of 25,930,295 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,341
of 226,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,440
of 293,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#56
of 4,920 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,930,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,920 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.