↓ Skip to main content

Categories of Auditory Performance and Speech Intelligibility Ratings of Early-Implanted Children without Speech Training

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Categories of Auditory Performance and Speech Intelligibility Ratings of Early-Implanted Children without Speech Training
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0053852
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huiqun Zhou, Zhengnong Chen, Haibo Shi, Yaqin Wu, Shankai Yin

Abstract

To assess whether speech therapy can lead to better results for early cochlear implantation (CI) children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 25%
Student > Postgraduate 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 27 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Psychology 6 6%
Linguistics 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 27 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,297,728
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#87,053
of 196,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,584
of 280,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,916
of 5,030 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,030 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.