↓ Skip to main content

Psychological Factors, Including Alexithymia, in the Prediction of Cardiovascular Risk in HIV Infected Patients: Results of a Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological Factors, Including Alexithymia, in the Prediction of Cardiovascular Risk in HIV Infected Patients: Results of a Cohort Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054555
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giustino Parruti, Francesco Vadini, Federica Sozio, Elena Mazzott, Tamara Ursini, Ennio Polill, Paola Di Stefano, Monica Tontodonati, Maria C. Verrocchio, Mario Fulcheri, Giulio Calella, Francesca Santilli, Lamberto Manzoli

Abstract

Psychological factors are known predictors of cardiovascular disease in many clinical settings, but data are lacking for HIV infection. We carried out a prospective cohort study to evaluate potential psychological predictors of preclinical and clinical vascular disease in HIV patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 91 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 25 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 30%
Psychology 21 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 26 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2013.
All research outputs
#14,160,293
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#115,757
of 193,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,540
of 279,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,826
of 5,005 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,005 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.