↓ Skip to main content

Does neighbourhood social capital aid in levelling the social gradient in the health and well-being of children and adolescents? A literature review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does neighbourhood social capital aid in levelling the social gradient in the health and well-being of children and adolescents? A literature review
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-65
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veerle Vyncke, Bart De Clercq, Veerle Stevens, Caroline Costongs, Giorgio Barbareschi, Stefán Hrafn Jónsson, Sara Darias Curvo, Vladimir Kebza, Candace Currie, Lea Maes

Abstract

Although most countries in the European Union are richer and healthier than ever, health inequalities remain an important public health challenge. Health-related problems and premature death have disproportionately been reported in disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Neighbourhood social capital is believed to influence the association between neighbourhood deprivation and health in children and adolescents, making it a potentially interesting concept for policymakers.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Unknown 224 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 19%
Student > Master 39 17%
Researcher 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 51 22%
Unknown 30 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 64 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Psychology 16 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 3%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 48 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,147,188
of 17,358,590 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,235
of 11,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,349
of 254,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,358,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.