You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Xerostomia induced by radiotherapy: an overview of the physiopathology, clinical evidence, and management of the oral damage
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, February 2015
Roberto Pinna, Guglielmo Campus, Enzo Cumbo, Ida Mura, Egle Milia
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||53||18%|
|Student > Bachelor||43||14%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||27||9%|
|Student > Postgraduate||24||8%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||16||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||125||42%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||20||7%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||11||4%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||9||3%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||7||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
of 1,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 352,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.