↓ Skip to main content

An Improved Genotyping by Sequencing (GBS) Approach Offering Increased Versatility and Efficiency of SNP Discovery and Genotyping

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
6 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
393 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
715 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Improved Genotyping by Sequencing (GBS) Approach Offering Increased Versatility and Efficiency of SNP Discovery and Genotyping
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054603
Pubmed ID
Authors

Humira Sonah, Maxime Bastien, Elmer Iquira, Aurélie Tardivel, Gaétan Légaré, Brian Boyle, Éric Normandeau, Jérôme Laroche, Stéphane Larose, Martine Jean, François Belzile

Abstract

Highly parallel SNP genotyping platforms have been developed for some important crop species, but these platforms typically carry a high cost per sample for first-time or small-scale users. In contrast, recently developed genotyping by sequencing (GBS) approaches offer a highly cost effective alternative for simultaneous SNP discovery and genotyping. In the present investigation, we have explored the use of GBS in soybean. In addition to developing a novel analysis pipeline to call SNPs and indels from the resulting sequence reads, we have devised a modified library preparation protocol to alter the degree of complexity reduction. We used a set of eight diverse soybean genotypes to conduct a pilot scale test of the protocol and pipeline. Using ApeKI for GBS library preparation and sequencing on an Illumina GAIIx machine, we obtained 5.5 M reads and these were processed using our pipeline. A total of 10,120 high quality SNPs were obtained and the distribution of these SNPs mirrored closely the distribution of gene-rich regions in the soybean genome. A total of 39.5% of the SNPs were present in genic regions and 52.5% of these were located in the coding sequence. Validation of over 400 genotypes at a set of randomly selected SNPs using Sanger sequencing showed a 98% success rate. We then explored the use of selective primers to achieve a greater complexity reduction during GBS library preparation. The number of SNP calls could be increased by almost 40% and their depth of coverage was more than doubled, thus opening the door to an increase in the throughput and a significant decrease in the per sample cost. The approach to obtain high quality SNPs developed here will be helpful for marker assisted genomics as well as assessment of available genetic resources for effective utilisation in a wide number of species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 715 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 2%
Brazil 6 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Argentina 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Other 14 2%
Unknown 663 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 174 24%
Researcher 166 23%
Student > Master 102 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 48 7%
Student > Postgraduate 37 5%
Other 108 15%
Unknown 80 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 511 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 70 10%
Environmental Science 12 2%
Computer Science 7 <1%
Engineering 5 <1%
Other 22 3%
Unknown 88 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,945,066
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#38,077
of 202,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,094
of 284,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#829
of 5,016 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,016 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.