RT @LotusOak2: #STUDY in JAMA: #Sugar Industry & Coronary Heart Disease Research: Historical Analysis https://t.co/iMKwAHc6oY
RT @LotusOak2: #STUDY in JAMA: #Sugar Industry & Coronary Heart Disease Research: Historical Analysis https://t.co/iMKwAHc6oY
RT @LotusOak2: #STUDY in JAMA: #Sugar Industry & Coronary Heart Disease Research: Historical Analysis https://t.co/iMKwAHc6oY
RT @LotusOak2: #STUDY in JAMA: #Sugar Industry & Coronary Heart Disease Research: Historical Analysis https://t.co/iMKwAHc6oY
RT @LotusOak2: #STUDY in JAMA: #Sugar Industry & Coronary Heart Disease Research: Historical Analysis https://t.co/iMKwAHc6oY
RT @LotusOak2: #STUDY in JAMA: #Sugar Industry & Coronary Heart Disease Research: Historical Analysis https://t.co/iMKwAHc6oY
RT @LotusOak2: #STUDY in JAMA: #Sugar Industry & Coronary Heart Disease Research: Historical Analysis https://t.co/iMKwAHc6oY
Bazı komplo teorilerinin altı da boş değilmiş . Adamlar verileri hasır altı etmişler . Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research https://t.co/mMYxxF8plW
Moar sauce: "𝙀𝙖𝙧𝙡𝙮 𝙬𝙖𝙧𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙨𝙞𝙜𝙣𝙖𝙡𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙧𝙤𝙣𝙖𝙧𝙮 𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙩 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙚 (𝘾𝙃𝘿) 𝙧𝙞𝙨𝙠 𝙤𝙛 𝙨𝙪𝙜𝙖𝙧 (𝙨𝙪𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙚) 𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙜𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 1950𝙨." https://t.co/KOUnQwlGX8
Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research: A Historical Analysis of Internal Industry Documents | Cardiology | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network https://t.co/yIWgIaKe2C
“The Sugar Research Foundation sponsored its first Coronary Heart Disiase research project in 1965, a literature review published in the New England Journal of Medicine, which singled out fat and... https://t.co/vfdUksvocM
Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research A Historical Analysis of Internal Industry Documents https://t.co/9uw0G7MFOX
Argh! The link between sugar and heart disease emerged in 1950. 1950 😳 Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research: A Historical Analysis of Internal Industry Documents | Cardiology | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network https://t.co/Yuz2Dj90M7
RT @LotusOak2: #STUDY in JAMA: #Sugar Industry & Coronary Heart Disease Research: Historical Analysis https://t.co/iMKwAHc6oY
RT @LotusOak2: #STUDY in JAMA: #Sugar Industry & Coronary Heart Disease Research: Historical Analysis https://t.co/iMKwAHc6oY
RT @LotusOak2: #STUDY in JAMA: #Sugar Industry & Coronary Heart Disease Research: Historical Analysis https://t.co/iMKwAHc6oY
RT @LotusOak2: #STUDY in JAMA: #Sugar Industry & Coronary Heart Disease Research: Historical Analysis https://t.co/iMKwAHc6oY
Do not trust scientific research or commentary without reference to funding. Today in Georgia Big Tobacco funds NGOs and Chambers of Commerce. Cheap imported cigarettes and vaping target Georgian children. Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research
@AtheistEngineer @GlochMichael Money talks https://t.co/P58V7Ocihm
El hallazgo estaba en consonancia con la denuncia sobre el patrocinio de los estudios iniciales que fijaban su atención sobre los lípidos mientras ponían en duda el efecto de los carbohidratos. https://t.co/bxRNIitJK2
RT @NutritionalThe3: Writing a blog, turned this up. It's oldy but goldy. "Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research. A Historic…
Writing a blog, turned this up. It's oldy but goldy. "Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research. A Historical Analysis of Internal Industry Documents" https://t.co/DchfAE9Ven
@1Natsu01 È meglio che @RobertoBurioni non parli di alimentazione: https://t.co/S5Ct2s8vrg
Questo paper dimostra l'esistenza e l'efficacia della Sugar Research Foundation. Peccato che il grande blastatore parli di cose che non conosce. https://t.co/8JSd0L8jaE https://t.co/DZtVSpKeBX
@RobertoBurioni @lucianocapone @andrea_bignami L'articolo pubblicato su JAMA Intern Med. ne dimostra l'esistenza e l'efficacia. "Le nostre scoperte suggeriscono che l'industria ha sponsorizzato un programma di ricerca negli anni '60 e '70 che ha messo in d
RT @mlalanda: @drmiguelmarcos El problema principal es que de la evidencia que venimos manejando hace años fue manipulada desde el principi…
@drmiguelmarcos El problema principal es que de la evidencia que venimos manejando hace años fue manipulada desde el principio. Resulta dificil saber de qué fiarnos. Seguro sabes que la industria del azucar "compró" algunos estudios para culpar a los lípid
自分の備忘録のためにツィート。これで「ヘルシー(低脂質、低カロリー)が実は身体には良くない」ことが暴かれたわけです。すべては砂糖業界の戦略。#金森式ダイエット https://t.co/p4x7yLjz6n
RT @ViraBurnayeva: #STUDY in JAMA: #Sugar Industry & Coronary Heart Disease Research: Historical Analysis https://t.co/iMKwAHc6oY
RT @ViraBurnayeva: #STUDY in JAMA: #Sugar Industry & Coronary Heart Disease Research: Historical Analysis https://t.co/iMKwAHc6oY
Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research https://t.co/nP214jMh5z
RT @23ydobemos: 38. Но Фонд Исследования Сахара (Sugar Research Foundation) быстренько проспонсировал нужные исследования, и эту теорию зат…
RT @23ydobemos: 38. Но Фонд Исследования Сахара (Sugar Research Foundation) быстренько проспонсировал нужные исследования, и эту теорию зат…
روابط مصادر ما ورد في التغريدة السابقة: الصورة عاليمين من هنا: https://t.co/nsDqv2RyIL الصورة على اليسار: https://t.co/OTUDXXOUAM https://t.co/GOpi92ASXk
@DoctorTro @CakeNutrition @ahhite @nickjlo @fuelled_by_keto @gerdosi @FatEmperor @MacroFour @fatisourfriend And then in the 1960s we started ‘cooking the books’ JAMA again: https://t.co/QFz0tGBsOB https://t.co/swP1HY2K22
Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research: A Historical Analysis of Internal Industry Documents https://t.co/T3YF1GReeG
RT @DiegoNSalman: Investigación sobre influencia de la industria del azúcar en la ciencia de enfermedades coronarias y pautas nutricionales…
Investigación sobre influencia de la industria del azúcar en la ciencia de enfermedades coronarias y pautas nutricionales desde los años '50 #LowCarbChile https://t.co/oDbDF5xZuZ https://t.co/x10Q8vlIrz
@Nodusgordius @IvetaBuike @suncfunsungejs Runājot par pērkamiem pētījumiem - te var sanākt vesels thread: 1) https://t.co/Os8hGx8sow pētījumus par "nekaitīgu svinu sponsorēja Big Oil; 2) Big Sugar maksāja par pētījumiem par" kaitīgiem" taukiem https://t.co
@EstebanDL @ApsalOrg Gracias por la información, es raro ver que un médico se cuestione todo lo que lee actualmente. Dejo el link de artículo de JAMA. https://t.co/NLlq3y1LaG https://t.co/Zr7K0Rh4eY
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @dgps2010: @clairlemon @nature Corruption goes back a long way. We've already lost respect for them, 'climate change' is only the latest…
@SoSBega @mackinprof @BioLayne Do you ever research anything before making idiotic statements? https://t.co/yowZ3DI3YU https://t.co/Y4D4yqFZ7K
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @gojomo: The Butter/fry Effect: a tiny lobby waving its cash 54 years ago caused giant negative effects on public health, globally for d…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @gojomo: The Butter/fry Effect: a tiny lobby waving its cash 54 years ago caused giant negative effects on public health, globally for d…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @gojomo: The Butter/fry Effect: a tiny lobby waving its cash 54 years ago caused giant negative effects on public health, globally for d…
RT @gojomo: The Butter/fry Effect: a tiny lobby waving its cash 54 years ago caused giant negative effects on public health, globally for d…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @gojomo: The Butter/fry Effect: a tiny lobby waving its cash 54 years ago caused giant negative effects on public health, globally for d…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
The Butter/fry Effect: a tiny lobby waving its cash 54 years ago caused giant negative effects on public health, globally for decades
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
Media scares cause real harm.
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
Three generations were fed this as the gospel for nutrition.
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
True blood money.
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…
RT @nathancofnas: In 1965 the Sugar Research Foundation paid 3 Harvard scientists $49k in today's $ to publish a fraudulent review article…