↓ Skip to main content

Spatial organization of frequency preference and selectivity in the human inferior colliculus

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial organization of frequency preference and selectivity in the human inferior colliculus
Published in
Nature Communications, January 2013
DOI 10.1038/ncomms2379
Pubmed ID
Authors

Federico De Martino, Michelle Moerel, Pierre-Francois van de Moortele, Kamil Ugurbil, Rainer Goebel, Essa Yacoub, Elia Formisano

Abstract

To date, the functional organization of human auditory subcortical structures can only be inferred from animal models. Here we use high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging at ultra-high magnetic fields (7T) to map the organization of spectral responses in the human inferior colliculus, a subcortical structure fundamental for sound processing. We reveal a tonotopic map with a spatial gradient of preferred frequencies approximately oriented from dorsolateral (low frequencies) to ventromedial (high frequencies) locations. Furthermore, we observe a spatial organization of spectral selectivity (tuning) of functional magnetic resonance imaging responses in the human inferior colliculus. Along isofrequency contours, functional magnetic resonance imaging tuning is narrowest in central locations and broadest in the surrounding regions. Finally, by comparing subcortical and cortical auditory areas we show that functional magnetic resonance imaging tuning is narrower in human inferior colliculus than on the cortical surface. Our findings pave the way to noninvasive investigations of sound processing in human subcortical nuclei and for studying the interplay between subcortical and cortical neuronal populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 2%
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Israel 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 154 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 24%
Student > Master 18 10%
Professor 11 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 19 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 41 24%
Psychology 29 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 8%
Engineering 9 5%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 39 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,673,465
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#32,127
of 46,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,436
of 279,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#130
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.