↓ Skip to main content

The Human Functional Brain Network Demonstrates Structural and Dynamical Resilience to Targeted Attack

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Human Functional Brain Network Demonstrates Structural and Dynamical Resilience to Targeted Attack
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002885
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen E. Joyce, Satoru Hayasaka, Paul J. Laurienti

Abstract

In recent years, the field of network science has enabled researchers to represent the highly complex interactions in the brain in an approachable yet quantitative manner. One exciting finding since the advent of brain network research was that the brain network can withstand extensive damage, even to highly connected regions. However, these highly connected nodes may not be the most critical regions of the brain network, and it is unclear how the network dynamics are impacted by removal of these key nodes. This work seeks to further investigate the resilience of the human functional brain network. Network attack experiments were conducted on voxel-wise functional brain networks and region-of-interest (ROI) networks of 5 healthy volunteers. Networks were attacked at key nodes using several criteria for assessing node importance, and the impact on network structure and dynamics was evaluated. The findings presented here echo previous findings that the functional human brain network is highly resilient to targeted attacks, both in terms of network structure and dynamics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 129 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 25%
Student > Master 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 28 21%
Psychology 16 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 11%
Physics and Astronomy 12 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 24 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,853,486
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,189
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,514
of 289,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#60
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.