↓ Skip to main content

The effect of intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab on cutaneous tensile strength during wound healing

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab on cutaneous tensile strength during wound healing
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2013
DOI 10.2147/opth.s40537
Pubmed ID
Authors

John B Christoforidis, Jillian Wang, Angela Jiang, James Willard, Cedric Pratt, Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul, Sashwati Roy, Heather Powell

Abstract

To investigate the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab on wound tension and by histopathology during cutaneous wound healing in a rabbit model and to compare this effect to placebo intravitreal saline controls 1 and 2 weeks following intravitreal injection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Other 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Engineering 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Decision Sciences 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2013.
All research outputs
#15,879,822
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,281
of 3,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,462
of 289,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#13
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.