↓ Skip to main content

Sustaining remission of psychotic depression: rationale, design and methodology of STOP-PD ΙΙ

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sustaining remission of psychotic depression: rationale, design and methodology of STOP-PD ΙΙ
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-13-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alastair J Flint, Barnett S Meyers, Anthony J Rothschild, Ellen M Whyte, Benoit H Mulsant, Matthew V Rudorfer, Patricia Marino

Abstract

Psychotic depression (PD) is a severe disabling disorder with considerable morbidity and mortality. Electroconvulsive therapy and pharmacotherapy are each efficacious in the treatment of PD. Expert guidelines recommend the combination of antidepressant and antipsychotic medications in the acute pharmacologic treatment of PD. However, little is known about the continuation treatment of PD. Of particular concern, it is not known whether antipsychotic medication needs to be continued once an episode of PD responds to pharmacotherapy. This issue has profound clinical importance. On the one hand, the unnecessary continuation of antipsychotic medication exposes a patient to adverse effects, such as weight gain and metabolic disturbance. On the other hand, premature discontinuation of antipsychotic medication has the potential risk of early relapse of a severe disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 149 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Researcher 13 8%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 45 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 32%
Psychology 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 50 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#5,613,923
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,885
of 4,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,357
of 282,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#31
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.