↓ Skip to main content

The optimal vaccination strategy to control COVID-19: a modeling study in Wuhan City, China

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Diseases of Poverty, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The optimal vaccination strategy to control COVID-19: a modeling study in Wuhan City, China
Published in
Infectious Diseases of Poverty, December 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40249-021-00922-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ze-yu Zhao, Yan Niu, Li Luo, Qing-qing Hu, Tian-long Yang, Mei-jie Chu, Qiu-ping Chen, Zhao Lei, Jia Rui, Cheng-long Song, Sheng-nan Lin, Yao Wang, Jing-wen Xu, Yuan-zhao Zhu, Xing-chun Liu, Meng Yang, Jie-feng Huang, Wei-kang Liu, Bin Deng, Chan Liu, Zhuo-yang Li, Pei-hua Li, Yan-hua Su, Ben-hua Zhao, Wen-long Huang, Roger Frutos, Tian-mu Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 16 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2021.
All research outputs
#17,155,195
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Diseases of Poverty
#128
of 184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,848
of 525,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Diseases of Poverty
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 525,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them