↓ Skip to main content

Robust Short-Term Memory without Synaptic Learning

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Robust Short-Term Memory without Synaptic Learning
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0050276
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel Johnson, J. Marro, Joaquín J. Torres

Abstract

Short-term memory in the brain cannot in general be explained the way long-term memory can--as a gradual modification of synaptic weights--since it takes place too quickly. Theories based on some form of cellular bistability, however, do not seem able to account for the fact that noisy neurons can collectively store information in a robust manner. We show how a sufficiently clustered network of simple model neurons can be instantly induced into metastable states capable of retaining information for a short time (a few seconds). The mechanism is robust to different network topologies and kinds of neural model. This could constitute a viable means available to the brain for sensory and/or short-term memory with no need of synaptic learning. Relevant phenomena described by neurobiology and psychology, such as local synchronization of synaptic inputs and power-law statistics of forgetting avalanches, emerge naturally from this mechanism, and we suggest possible experiments to test its viability in more biological settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 3 3%
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Belarus 1 1%
Slovakia 1 1%
Unknown 83 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 30%
Student > Master 13 14%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 18%
Psychology 17 18%
Neuroscience 12 13%
Computer Science 11 12%
Physics and Astronomy 8 9%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 9 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2013.
All research outputs
#1,515,756
of 23,864,690 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#19,380
of 203,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,679
of 284,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#441
of 5,012 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,864,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,012 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.