↓ Skip to main content

Alcohol use in South Sudan in relation to social factors, mental distress and traumatic events

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alcohol use in South Sudan in relation to social factors, mental distress and traumatic events
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-3605-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lars Lien, Edvard Hauff, Priscilla Martinez, Arne H. Eide, Leslie Swarts, Touraj Ayazi

Abstract

Alcohol use is a major public health problem with vast implications for poor, war-torn countries. The objective of this study was to describe prevalence of alcohol use and risky drinking across socio-demographic factors in South Sudan, and to determine the association between risky drinking, traumatic events and mental distress. This is a randomized, population based, cross-sectional study from the north-western part of South Sudan with nearly 500 participants. We used the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as main outcome variable, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) for mental distress and five questions to assess traumatic events. The mean AUDIT score was 2.7 (SD 0.3) with 14,2 % in the high risk problem drinking category. Being male, lack of a regular income and psychological distress were significantly associated with higher AUDIT score. Traumatic events, however, was not associated with higher score on AUDIT. Despite decades of civil war and great poverty the alcohol use in this population was at the same level as other countries in Southern Africa. Traumatic events were not related to risk of problem drinking.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Vietnam 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 27 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Social Sciences 9 13%
Psychology 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 29 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2016.
All research outputs
#12,904,814
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,917
of 14,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,526
of 334,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#218
of 366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.