↓ Skip to main content

The Oral Microbiome of Children: Development, Disease, and Implications Beyond Oral Health

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Oral Microbiome of Children: Development, Disease, and Implications Beyond Oral Health
Published in
Microbial Ecology, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00248-016-0854-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andres Gomez, Karen E. Nelson

Abstract

In the era of applied meta-omics and personalized medicine, the oral microbiome is a valuable asset. From biomarker discovery to being a powerful source of therapeutic targets and to presenting an opportunity for developing non-invasive approaches to health care, it has become clear that oral microbes may hold the answer for understanding disease, even beyond the oral cavity. Although our understanding of oral microbiome diversity has come a long way in the past 50 years, there are still many areas that need to be fine-tuned for better risk assessment and diagnosis, especially in early developmental stages of human life. Here, we discuss the factors that impact development of the oral microbiome and explore oral markers of disease, with a focus on the early oral cavity. Our ultimate goal is to put different experimental and methodological views into perspective for better assessment of early oral and systemic disease at an early age and discuss how oral microbiomes-at the community level-could provide improved assessment in individuals and populations at risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 305 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 11%
Researcher 30 10%
Student > Master 28 9%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Other 52 17%
Unknown 110 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 127 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,753,282
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#67
of 2,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,147
of 328,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.