↓ Skip to main content

Rationale and design of South Asian Birth Cohort (START): a Canada-India collaborative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rationale and design of South Asian Birth Cohort (START): a Canada-India collaborative study
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-79
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonia S Anand, Anil Vasudevan, Milan Gupta, Katherine Morrison, Anura Kurpad, Koon K Teo, Krishnamachari Srinivasan

Abstract

People who originate from the Indian subcontinent (South Asians) suffer among the highest rates of type 2 diabetes in the world. Prior evidence suggests that metabolic risk factors develop early in life and are influenced by maternal and paternal behaviors, the intrauterine environment, and genetic factors. The South Asian Birth Cohort Study (START) will investigate the environmental and genetic basis of adiposity among 750 South Asian offspring recruited from highly divergent environments, namely, rural and urban India and urban Canada.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 153 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 19%
Student > Bachelor 25 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Psychology 11 7%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 35 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2013.
All research outputs
#5,665,573
of 10,502,506 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,049
of 7,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,668
of 307,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#235
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,502,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.