↓ Skip to main content

Racialised people in clinical guideline panels

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
149 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Racialised people in clinical guideline panels
Published in
The Lancet, January 2022
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02759-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nav Persaud, Muhamad Ally, Hannah Woods, Aine Workentin, Nancy N Baxter, Andrew Boozary, Quinn Grundy, Aisha Lofters, Kwame McKenzie, Andrew Pinto, Holger J Schünemann, Sharon Straus

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 149 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 127. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#326,880
of 25,374,374 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#3,400
of 42,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,793
of 518,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#86
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.