↓ Skip to main content

Remediating buildings damaged by dampness and mould for preventing or reducing respiratory tract symptoms, infections and asthma.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Remediating buildings damaged by dampness and mould for preventing or reducing respiratory tract symptoms, infections and asthma.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007897.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riitta Sauni, Jukka Uitti, Merja Jauhiainen, Kathleen Kreiss, Torben Sigsgaard, Jos H Verbeek, Sauni R, Uitti J, Jauhiainen M, Kreiss K, Sigsgaard T, Verbeek JH, Sauni, Riitta, Uitti, Jukka, Jauhiainen, Merja, Kreiss, Kathleen, Sigsgaard, Torben, Verbeek, Jos H

Abstract

Dampness and mould in buildings have been associated with adverse respiratory symptoms, asthma and respiratory infections of inhabitants. Moisture damage is a very common problem in private houses, workplaces and public buildings such as schools.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Student > Master 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 49%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Psychology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2013.
All research outputs
#2,627,818
of 11,415,522 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,308
of 9,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,703
of 312,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#334
of 551 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,415,522 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 551 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.