↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental implants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental implants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003069.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Gabriella Grusovin, Paul Coulthard, Helen V Worthington, Peter George, Marco Esposito

Abstract

It is important to institute an effective supportive therapy to maintain or recover soft tissue health around dental implants. Different maintenance regimens have been suggested, however it is unclear which are the most effective.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 229 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Student > Postgraduate 25 11%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 45 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 137 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Psychology 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 50 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,285,317
of 16,920,965 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,351
of 11,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,106
of 255,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#171
of 509 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,920,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 509 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.